Inserisci una parola o una frase in qualsiasi lingua 👆
Lingua:
Traduzione e analisi delle parole tramite l'intelligenza artificiale ChatGPT
In questa pagina puoi ottenere un'analisi dettagliata di una parola o frase, prodotta utilizzando la migliore tecnologia di intelligenza artificiale fino ad oggi:
- come viene usata la parola
- frequenza di utilizzo
- è usato più spesso nel discorso orale o scritto
- opzioni di traduzione delle parole
- esempi di utilizzo (varie frasi con traduzione)
- etimologia
sans distinction de personnes - traduzione in Inglese
EPISTEMOLOGICAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN STATEMENTS OF FACT (POSITIVE, DESCRIPTIVE) BASED ON REASON AND PHYSICAL OBSERVATION AND STATEMENTS OF VALUE (NORMATIVE, PRESCRIPTIVE) ABOUT ETHICS AND AESTHETICS, STUDIED VIA AXIOLOGY
Fact-Value Distinction; Fact/value distinction; Fact/Value distinction; Fact/Value Distinction; Fact-value Distinction; Fact/value Distinction; Fact-Value distinction; Fact-value gap; Fact-value dichotomy; Fact value distinction; Fact and value; Fact-value distinction
sans distinction de personnes
without fear or favor
Definizione
sans serif
[san's?r?f]
(also sanserif) Printing
¦ noun a style of type without serifs.
¦ adjective without serifs.
Origin
C19: appar. from Fr. sans 'without' + serif.
Wikipedia
Fact–value distinction
The fact–value distinction is a fundamental epistemological distinction described between:
- 'Statements of fact' ('positive' or 'descriptive statements'), based upon reason and physical observation, and which are examined via the empirical method.
- 'Statements of value' ('normative' or 'prescriptive statements'), which encompass ethics and aesthetics, and are studied via axiology.
This barrier between 'fact' and 'value' implies it is impossible to derive ethical claims from factual arguments, or to defend the former using the latter.
The fact–value distinction is closely related to, and derived from, the is–ought problem in moral philosophy, characterized by David Hume. The terms are often used interchangeably, though philosophical discourse concerning the is–ought problem does not usually encompass aesthetics.
